Virtual meetings will focus on State-mandated new Residential Food Scrap Recycling Program
Waste Management, the City’s waste hauler, will host a Virtual Townhall at 6 pm on November 30 and December 16 regarding the new Residential Food Scrap Recycling Program rolling out on New Year’s Day in response to State law.
Beginning January 1, 2022, Senate Bill 1383, whose lead author is Ricardo Lara, requires residents to begin placing food scraps like fruit and vegetable trimmings, eggshells, pasta, grains, coffee grounds, leftover inedible food, and expired food, along with their garden trimmings into the green-lidded container provided by Waste Management of Orange County. The materials will be collected on the same day as residents’ trash and recycling containers and transported to a facility for composting. See the FAQs about the Food Scrap Recycling Program at this link.
SB 1383 requires residents across California to participate in organics recycling. According to the State, the program aims to reduce short-lived climate pollutants coming from local landfills from food rotting and emitting methane. Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas that traps heat in the atmosphere, which is bad for the environment and climate. By collecting food scraps and yard waste for composting, experts say we can avoid some of these negative effects of sending these materials to landfill and create nutritious soil amendment in the process.
Residents can learn more about the new State-mandated program from Waste Management. The virtual meeting link will be live on November 30. No registration is required.
View the October 28 Virtual Town Hall meeting on YouTube.
How are we supposed to add another trash bin (3rd) in a small single car garage?
WM needs to put this on YouTube so those of us unable to make either meeting has access to it. Waste Management works for us: we are their customer. Let’s make this user friendly.
The sad reality is that the majority of what is placed into the recycling bin does not get recycled. The primary reason is a flawed process. These flaws include lack of return on investment and improper handling.
FACT: EPA estimates only 8% of plastics are recycled.
FACT: EPA estimates only 31% of paper is recycled.
FACT: EPA estimates only 31% of glass is recycled.
It is annoying that the State of California sees fit to place further laws/demands on the shoulders of the citizens when the State has not demonstrated the competence to devise and manage a functional solution. Like many well-meaning, save-the-world laws, California's recycling scheme has been a gesture, not a solution.
Some city residents have received literature in the mail about this new program.
But I have not received anything. Is it forthcoming? When?
While the information you provided above is certainly useful, you neglected to provide the time for the virtual meeting. Please revise your information so those of us who would like to attend can plan accordingly.
I didn't see a time for the virtual meeting
OK Another whack job gets a law that really makes little sense. Consider how many people have lawn service - so no lawn clippings, couple this with the bleat of water conservation so many of us now have artificial lawns. Where are we suppose to put these scraps? Oh! I know the next mandate is that all citizens should have their own COMPOST piles, or how about another container dedicated for food scraps, then another for used toilet paper, then another for steel cans and another for glass, aluminum etc.
The meeting is at 6 p.m. according to the article above. And yes, we WILL have a container for food scraps. Ours was delivered about a week ago. I am not looking forward to having that smelly thing in my kitchen & schlepping it out to the bins when it gets full. It seems to me that we're doing someone's job for him by separating all our "recyclables," which we know aren't even necessarily recycled.
Do we need to pre-register to get a link to the meeting or can everyone join?
I would like to attend.
This is another example of the state of California's overstep. No wonder people are leaving the state! Waste Management advertises when you call them and are put on hold that they process and sell methane produced in their landfills. Why is the state now mandating that those of us who do not have a third trash can get another to handle food waste (how is producing another plastic trash can good for the environment?) We live in a condominium and do not have yard clipping or the third can for it. Now we will be required to store a third trash can, a third truck will now come into our community (where is the environmental concern for that?) There are only two of us in our household and we do not have much food waste. Waste Management is processing Methane and we don't have room in our garage for another trash can. What a waste!
Senate Bill 1383 is a bad bill and lead author is Ricardo Lara should be ashamed to have pushed this on California residents.
This is absolutely absurd. So we are supposed to leave the little bucket that WM delivered on our counter, which will stink up our house and attract ants and pests. Then we are to set it out on trash day, which the rats, coyotes and crows will have a field day with. Then WM is going to have an employee walking around collecting and emptying these. Then we get the pleasure of washing them. Dumbest thing I have ever seen.
Seems that this program is creating more plastic that will not be recyclable, a burden on the consumer to find a place to put this idiotic box, separate from our already built in trash drawers, and using more water to keep more "STUFF" clean. Tell me where the logic is on waste of our tax dollars?
Just found out from a friend in a neighboring city (Aliso Viejo) that they are not required to dispose of their organic trash in the same manner that we are going to be required to do so, in a separate small container that has no place in our kitchens? Tell us why this is required of some, but not others in our county?
Is there a yes and no list for contaoners?
Just watched the virtual presentation.. The only questions answered were what the mediator chose.. The real question on sanitation of the trash cans were never answered..